We want to share an article that shows the data behind the results we see at RunDNA and the importance of gait analysis & gait retraining. Below are our 3 take aways from the research article. Just want to read the article? Here it is.
1. Rarely do we get excited over tables in an article, but Table 2 really did the trick.
Table 2 presents studies that look at different gait retraining strategies and the correlated results. Some of the articles referenced even talk about specific cues for specific injuries. The cues address step-rate, hip adduction, tibial acceleration, ground reaction forces, foot strike pattern, and trunk lean. While we’ve found a lot of other cues that work, too (which are taught in the Level 2 Course), it’s great to see researchers looking at how to personalize gait retraining cues because every runner responds differently!
Â
2. EXTERNAL FEEDBACK!
Using 3D can help you find what to prioritize in rehab. As Founder/CEO Doug Adams continued to use 3D, he saw a whole other level of benefit by providing external cues when combined with live biofeedback. A consistent finding in the studies reviewed in the article was the benefit of a graded feedback program. All clinicians can strive to provide more structure around providing feedback.
Â
3. Gait retraining is a piece of the puzzle!
As much as we love running analysis, it would be remiss to ignore the fact that we must look at runners as a whole person. Movement patterns outside of running are meaningful and significant. That is why we use the Runner Readiness Assessment from Level 1 and the Jumping Levels in Level 2 to assess where runners are and as a guide in prescribing a path to achieve more efficient, injury-free running.